Comments on: Why It’s Legal to View Prohibited Content http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/ An inchoate upside-down perspective Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:03:00 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: ISPs put hands up to play censor? Majors may go at filtering alone - Somebody Think Of The Children http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-6309 ISPs put hands up to play censor? Majors may go at filtering alone - Somebody Think Of The Children Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:54:05 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-6309 [...] is a broad classification category and in most cases content which falls under it is legal to possess and view in Australia (the exception being Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory or [...] [...] is a broad classification category and in most cases content which falls under it is legal to possess and view in Australia (the exception being Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory or [...]

]]> By: Conroy spreads more misinformation as PM and ACMA websites attacked - Somebody Think Of The Children http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2509 Conroy spreads more misinformation as PM and ACMA websites attacked - Somebody Think Of The Children Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:40:06 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-2509 [...] classification is an extremely broad classification category and in most cases it is legal to possess and view RC material in Australia (the exception being Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory or [...] [...] classification is an extremely broad classification category and in most cases it is legal to possess and view RC material in Australia (the exception being Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory or [...]

]]> By: No understanding or is Conroy deceiving public about refused classification - Somebody Think Of The Children http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-648 No understanding or is Conroy deceiving public about refused classification - Somebody Think Of The Children Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:52:04 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-648 [...] the content is illegal under other criminal codes, such as child abuse, RC content is legal to possess and view in Australia (with the exception of Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern [...] [...] the content is illegal under other criminal codes, such as child abuse, RC content is legal to possess and view in Australia (with the exception of Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern [...]

]]> By: Mandatory filter will block RC - Somebody Think Of The Children http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-141 Mandatory filter will block RC - Somebody Think Of The Children Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:17:05 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-141 [...] containing fetishes, euthanasia instruction material like The Peaceful Pill Handbook and of course anti-abortion material. It’s also legal to possess and view in Australia (with the exception of Western Australia [...] [...] containing fetishes, euthanasia instruction material like The Peaceful Pill Handbook and of course anti-abortion material. It’s also legal to possess and view in Australia (with the exception of Western Australia [...]

]]> By: Why ACMA Probably Won’t Fine You $11,000 a Day http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Why ACMA Probably Won’t Fine You $11,000 a Day Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:40:18 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-18 [...] detailed the definition of ‘prohibited content’ and ‘potential prohibited content’ in a previous post that dealt with such content hosted overseas. Recapping briefly, ‘prohibited content’ [...] [...] detailed the definition of ‘prohibited content’ and ‘potential prohibited content’ in a previous post that dealt with such content hosted overseas. Recapping briefly, ‘prohibited content’ [...]

]]> By: Rod Williams http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Rod Williams Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:21:25 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-9 The RC rules for movies, books, etc. were quite confusing themselves. However, they pale in comparison to these e-media laws. The RC rules for movies, books, etc. were quite confusing themselves.

However, they pale in comparison to these e-media laws.

]]> By: Five things I learned from the Insight episode on filtering - Somebody Think Of The Children http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Five things I learned from the Insight episode on filtering - Somebody Think Of The Children Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:25:32 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-7 [...] Most RC content is legal to possess and view in Australia, with the exception of Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. It’s a classification category that includes adult pornography containing fetishes like spanking… oh, and that anti-abortion web page we shouldn’t see. Refused Classification is a broad category of classified and unclassified content that when applied to the Internet is immediately unmanageable, not like any other censorship system in Australia and an unequivocal attack on free speech. [...] [...] Most RC content is legal to possess and view in Australia, with the exception of Western Australia and some indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. It’s a classification category that includes adult pornography containing fetishes like spanking… oh, and that anti-abortion web page we shouldn’t see. Refused Classification is a broad category of classified and unclassified content that when applied to the Internet is immediately unmanageable, not like any other censorship system in Australia and an unequivocal attack on free speech. [...]

]]> By: clarencegirl http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-6 clarencegirl Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:26:23 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-6 Very informative post. Really appreciated. Very informative post. Really appreciated.

]]> By: PollieGraph - Why It’s Legal to View Prohibited Content http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/04/02/why-it%e2%80%99s-legal-to-view-prohibited-content/comment-page-1/#comment-5 PollieGraph - Why It’s Legal to View Prohibited Content Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:52:27 +0000 http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=302#comment-5 [...] Continue reading this post at the Orzeszek Blog [...] [...] Continue reading this post at the Orzeszek Blog [...]

]]>