<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Enable OpenType Ligatures in Word 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/</link>
	<description>An inchoate upside-down perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:03:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-6234</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-6234</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a beautiful font, Gabriola, that has amazing flourishes that descend and ascend way beyond the norm...and in Publisher, they change as you type. Check out this Channel 9 video for more info...I&#039;m not into typography, but found it interesting: http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/LarryLarsen/The-Importance-of-Gabriola/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a beautiful font, Gabriola, that has amazing flourishes that descend and ascend way beyond the norm&#8230;and in Publisher, they change as you type. Check out this Channel 9 video for more info&#8230;I&#8217;m not into typography, but found it interesting: <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/LarryLarsen/The-Importance-of-Gabriola/" rel="nofollow">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/LarryLarsen/The-Importance-of-Gabriola/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (mit hacksause)</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>(mit hacksause)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;No normal person would care, but Microsoft has finally added support for Open...&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

No normal person would care, but Microsoft has finally added support for OpenType ligatures in Microsoft Word 2010 (Word 14)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;No normal person would care, but Microsoft has finally added support for Open&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>No normal person would care, but Microsoft has finally added support for OpenType ligatures in Microsoft Word 2010 (Word 14)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>@Steve: Yep. How many years do we have to wait for small caps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve: Yep. How many years do we have to wait for small caps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3598</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-3598</guid>
		<description>Finally we get it! And small caps still suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally we get it! And small caps still suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-617</guid>
		<description>And put it here too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenType#Advanced_typography to embarrass them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And put it here too: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenType#Advanced_typography" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenType#Advanced_typography</a> to embarrass them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I remember I&#039;d gotten a survey after 2007 RTMed for what features I&#039;d like to see and I gave them a good piece of my mind on how Apple&#039;s Pages and Keynote trump Word and PowerPoint for typography and impressive special effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember I&#8217;d gotten a survey after 2007 RTMed for what features I&#8217;d like to see and I gave them a good piece of my mind on how Apple&#8217;s Pages and Keynote trump Word and PowerPoint for typography and impressive special effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rm2kpro</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>rm2kpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Hey I was waiting for this feature for years! Neither OpenOffice.org nor Microsoft Office brought it until now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I was waiting for this feature for years! Neither OpenOffice.org nor Microsoft Office brought it until now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groonxz</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Groonxz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris. XP never looked so good. Either I am getting to be very old (I am) or else MS has come up with a new best-ever here. I forget whether it was Word 4 or Word 5 which was the previous &quot;best-ever&quot;. It was a DOS version, anyway; no graphics and no shell of any consequence; typewriter typefaces. But it was a real joy to use. I began with Word 3.2.

I used to refer to &quot;Word&quot;, but now I&#039;m calling it &quot;Office&quot;—just to see the ligature.

As for gentlemen in litagures using ligatures, well, I&#039;m not sure if &quot;litagures&quot; exists as its own word at all, although &quot;litigation&quot; must come from a root. Well, I&#039;ll let it pass. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris. XP never looked so good. Either I am getting to be very old (I am) or else MS has come up with a new best-ever here. I forget whether it was Word 4 or Word 5 which was the previous &#8220;best-ever&#8221;. It was a DOS version, anyway; no graphics and no shell of any consequence; typewriter typefaces. But it was a real joy to use. I began with Word 3.2.</p>
<p>I used to refer to &#8220;Word&#8221;, but now I&#8217;m calling it &#8220;Office&#8221;—just to see the ligature.</p>
<p>As for gentlemen in litagures using ligatures, well, I&#8217;m not sure if &#8220;litagures&#8221; exists as its own word at all, although &#8220;litigation&#8221; must come from a root. Well, I&#8217;ll let it pass. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I didn’t put that much thought into it. Being a lawyer, it’s my nature to be overly cautious.

I’m going off the explanations of standard, discretionary, and contextual ligatures &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typotheque.com/fonts/opentype_features&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Depending on the font that you select, you may get ligatures that you don’t want if you select &lt;strong&gt;All&lt;/strong&gt;.

Selecting &lt;strong&gt;Standard Only&lt;/strong&gt; ensures that you get the, well, standard ligatures that you would probably want, without stuff that you don’t (especially historical alternates). Experiment if you like.

There is no performance difference, and I don’t know why Microsoft doesn’t enable the few typographical features that Word supports by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn’t put that much thought into it. Being a lawyer, it’s my nature to be overly cautious.</p>
<p>I’m going off the explanations of standard, discretionary, and contextual ligatures <a href="http://www.typotheque.com/fonts/opentype_features" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Depending on the font that you select, you may get ligatures that you don’t want if you select <strong>All</strong>.</p>
<p>Selecting <strong>Standard Only</strong> ensures that you get the, well, standard ligatures that you would probably want, without stuff that you don’t (especially historical alternates). Experiment if you like.</p>
<p>There is no performance difference, and I don’t know why Microsoft doesn’t enable the few typographical features that Word supports by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groonxz</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Groonxz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Chris, I don&#039;t know anything at all about ligatures. But I do know the difference between a &quot;typeface&quot; and a &quot;font&quot;, and I am interested in what you are saying. I notice you suggested going for STANDARD ONLY, and I&#039;m wondering what the downside of this must be that (1) has Microsoft disable it by default, and (2) has you go for a cautious selection.

I mean, just suppose for a moment that there was a word-processing program that allowed a person to select ligature selections such as
None
Standard Only
Standard and Contexted
Historic and Discretionary
All
. . .and some kind of street-ruffian chanced upon that, and allowed his addictive-impulsive personality disorder to choose &quot;All&quot;. In what ways would that [further] ruin his life, and, as an older, wiser man, reminiscing on what he would do over again in another life, specifically why would he list it among his regrets? Would &quot;All&quot; have slowed his computer down, for example, or would it have turned all his writing into Ancient Greek, or would it have—well, WHAT would its downside have been?

I am sorry to bother you, but I have misplaced my LIGATURES FOR IMBECILES book. Thank you very much for your kind explanation. (By the way, I agree with those saying SpanDeX is best for professional writing. I always wear it myself. It lets me stretch for my coffee, and also, after too many hours of word-processing, the bright pink colour alerts me to what components belong to the computer and which are parts of my body.) Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I don&#8217;t know anything at all about ligatures. But I do know the difference between a &#8220;typeface&#8221; and a &#8220;font&#8221;, and I am interested in what you are saying. I notice you suggested going for STANDARD ONLY, and I&#8217;m wondering what the downside of this must be that (1) has Microsoft disable it by default, and (2) has you go for a cautious selection.</p>
<p>I mean, just suppose for a moment that there was a word-processing program that allowed a person to select ligature selections such as<br />
None<br />
Standard Only<br />
Standard and Contexted<br />
Historic and Discretionary<br />
All<br />
. . .and some kind of street-ruffian chanced upon that, and allowed his addictive-impulsive personality disorder to choose &#8220;All&#8221;. In what ways would that [further] ruin his life, and, as an older, wiser man, reminiscing on what he would do over again in another life, specifically why would he list it among his regrets? Would &#8220;All&#8221; have slowed his computer down, for example, or would it have turned all his writing into Ancient Greek, or would it have—well, WHAT would its downside have been?</p>
<p>I am sorry to bother you, but I have misplaced my LIGATURES FOR IMBECILES book. Thank you very much for your kind explanation. (By the way, I agree with those saying SpanDeX is best for professional writing. I always wear it myself. It lets me stretch for my coffee, and also, after too many hours of word-processing, the bright pink colour alerts me to what components belong to the computer and which are parts of my body.) Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I was disappointed that small caps weren’t properly implemented too. Perhaps they’ll still implement them. This version of Office 2010 was only a technical preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disappointed that small caps weren’t properly implemented too. Perhaps they’ll still implement them. This version of Office 2010 was only a technical preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milos</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Milos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-201</guid>
		<description>This is great news. I don&#039;t understand why can&#039;t they implement proper small caps? Compared to math support in Office 2007 this should be an easy thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news. I don&#8217;t understand why can&#8217;t they implement proper small caps? Compared to math support in Office 2007 this should be an easy thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Pages 09&#039;s OpenType support was almost unusable until 10.5.7 (May 2009). See this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9121017</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pages 09&#8217;s OpenType support was almost unusable until 10.5.7 (May 2009). See this thread:<br />
<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9121017" rel="nofollow">http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9121017</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD SCHELLNACK - DAS BLOG &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AXEL</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>HD SCHELLNACK - DAS BLOG &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AXEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] Office-Nutzer seit Jahren in Sachen OpenType außen vor (was sich mit der nächsten Version ändern soll). Bis dahin liefert die Axel eine saubere Lösung, zumal die SmallCaps (unter Word usw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office-Nutzer seit Jahren in Sachen OpenType außen vor (was sich mit der nächsten Version ändern soll). Bis dahin liefert die Axel eine saubere Lösung, zumal die SmallCaps (unter Word usw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-104</guid>
		<description>@Miguel Sousa: No, Word 2010 doesn’t appear to support true small caps etc. If you select small caps in the &lt;strong&gt;Font&lt;/strong&gt; dialog, Word 2010 just uses the shrunk down capitals formatting that Word has always used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miguel Sousa: No, Word 2010 doesn’t appear to support true small caps etc. If you select small caps in the <strong>Font</strong> dialog, Word 2010 just uses the shrunk down capitals formatting that Word has always used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Sousa</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Sousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Can Word 2010 also do true small caps and true superiors and inferiors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Word 2010 also do true small caps and true superiors and inferiors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office 2010 adds OpenType goodness &#124; Phinney on Fonts</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Office 2010 adds OpenType goodness &#124; Phinney on Fonts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] it. However, copies of Office 2010 have apparently already leaked, and some enterprising souls have posted screen shots of the new support for OpenType typographic features for western [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it. However, copies of Office 2010 have apparently already leaked, and some enterprising souls have posted screen shots of the new support for OpenType typographic features for western [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-98</guid>
		<description>@Dario: I just tested that. I hadn’t noticed that about Mac OS X before. Neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dario: I just tested that. I hadn’t noticed that about Mac OS X before. Neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-97</guid>
		<description>@rohanl that&#039;s correct, and not just for any Mac OS application but also for the GUI itself. Create a folder called &quot;ffi&quot; or &quot;fl&quot; and see how the name is rendered in the finder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rohanl that&#8217;s correct, and not just for any Mac OS application but also for the GUI itself. Create a folder called &#8220;ffi&#8221; or &#8220;fl&#8221; and see how the name is rendered in the finder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-96</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great news (and long overdue) - I updated my TeX vs. Word comparison with this announcement, thanks for sharing this!

http://nitens.org/taraborelli/latex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news (and long overdue) &#8211; I updated my TeX vs. Word comparison with this announcement, thanks for sharing this!</p>
<p><a href="http://nitens.org/taraborelli/latex" rel="nofollow">http://nitens.org/taraborelli/latex</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rohanl</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>rohanl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-91</guid>
		<description>
Oh and Apple’s Pages ‘09 already does this (I just checked).


Actually, it&#039;s done by Mac OS X, so all apps have access to it. Even TextEdit (Wordpad&#039;s equivalent) supports this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and Apple’s Pages ‘09 already does this (I just checked).</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s done by Mac OS X, so all apps have access to it. Even TextEdit (Wordpad&#8217;s equivalent) supports this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Yea, ditto Jeremy&#039;s comment. Any respectable typographer won&#039;t be using Word. LaTeX supports ligatures beautifully and if you&#039;re not into that, there&#039;s Adobe InDesign for professionals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, ditto Jeremy&#8217;s comment. Any respectable typographer won&#8217;t be using Word. LaTeX supports ligatures beautifully and if you&#8217;re not into that, there&#8217;s Adobe InDesign for professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-89</guid>
		<description>@Jeremy: I can’t believe it took so long either. I always found it amusing that Notepad in Vista supported OpenType ligatures, but Word did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy: I can’t believe it took so long either. I always found it amusing that Notepad in Vista supported OpenType ligatures, but Word did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-88</guid>
		<description>@Richard

If you care, you&#039;re probably already using TeX or LaTeX... furthermore you probably don&#039;t give a stuff about Word because once you&#039;ve learned TeX or LaTeX you&#039;re much more productive anyway (and you can do it in vi or emacs depending on your religious persuasion). Of course, this might finally make documents look professional (though people will stuff it up with bad design choices).

Microsoft, why did this take so long? Oh and Apple&#039;s Pages &#039;09 already does this (I just checked).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard</p>
<p>If you care, you&#8217;re probably already using TeX or LaTeX&#8230; furthermore you probably don&#8217;t give a stuff about Word because once you&#8217;ve learned TeX or LaTeX you&#8217;re much more productive anyway (and you can do it in vi or emacs depending on your religious persuasion). Of course, this might finally make documents look professional (though people will stuff it up with bad design choices).</p>
<p>Microsoft, why did this take so long? Oh and Apple&#8217;s Pages &#8216;09 already does this (I just checked).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/05/17/how-to-enable-opentype-ligatures-in-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=622#comment-87</guid>
		<description>@Bob: I hadn’t tried stylistic set 7 for Gabriola. It’s awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob: I hadn’t tried stylistic set 7 for Gabriola. It’s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
