<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Orzeszek Blog &#187; consumer law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/tag/consumer-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog</link>
	<description>An inchoate upside-down perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Clarity in Pricing Act’s New s&#160;53C Works</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/06/25/the-clarity-in-pricing-act%e2%80%99s-new-s53c-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/06/25/the-clarity-in-pricing-act%e2%80%99s-new-s53c-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[component pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I noticed that the advertising on the Greater Union website had changed. Previously, Greater Union enticed its visitors to join its CINE BUZZ club by promising $8 movie tickets. It buried a mandatory $1 per ticket ‘booking fee’ in the fine print. It appears that the updated s&#160;53C of the Trade Practices Act has put an end to this annoying practice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">R</span>ecently, I was checking session times on the <a href="http://www.greaterunion.com.au/">Greater Union website</a> and I noticed that their advertising had changed. Previously, Greater Union enticed its visitors to join its CINE BUZZ club with low ticket prices for certain movies:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cine-buzz-ad.png" alt="Greater Union CINE BUZZ advertisement" title="Greater Union CINE BUZZ advertisement" width="525" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-704 orz-img-border" /></p>
<p>This type of advertising always annoyed me. ‘How much for that eight-dollar ticket?’ ‘Nine dollars, thank you.’</p>
<p>The Commonwealth Parliament apparently agreed. Late last year, the Parliament passed the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/tpaipa2008400/"><em>Trade Practices Amendment (Clarity in Pricing) Act 2008</em> (Cth)</a>. It commenced operation on 25 May 2009.</p>
<p>The Act amended the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/tpa1974149/"><em>Trade Practices Act 1974</em> (Cth)</a>, replacing <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/tpa1974149/s53c.html">s&nbsp;53C</a> with an updated version designed to deal with these kinds of representations.</p>
<p><span id="more-703"></span></p>
<p>The section now provides:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="orz-li-1"><span class="orz-li-number">(1) </span><span class="orz-li-body">A corporation must not, in trade or commerce, in connection with:</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-2"><span class="orz-li-number">(a) </span><span class="orz-li-body">the supply or possible supply of goods or services to a person (the <strong><em>relevant person</em></strong>); or</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-2"><span class="orz-li-number">(b) </span><span class="orz-li-body">the promotion by any means of the supply of goods or services to a person (the <strong><em>relevant person</em></strong>) or of the use of goods or services by a person (the <strong><em>relevant person</em></strong>);</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-1"><span class="orz-li-body">make a representation with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute a part of the consideration for the supply of the goods or services unless the corporation also:</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-2"><span class="orz-li-number">(c) </span><span class="orz-li-body">specifies, in a prominent way and as a single figure, the single price for the goods or services; and</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-2"><span class="orz-li-number">(d) </span><span class="orz-li-body">if, in relation to goods:</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-3"><span class="orz-li-number">(i) </span><span class="orz-li-body">the corporation does not include in the single price a charge that is payable in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the relevant person; and</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-3"><span class="orz-li-number">(ii) </span><span class="orz-li-body">the corporation knows, at the time of the representation, the minimum amount of a charge in relation to sending the goods from the supplier to the relevant person that must be paid by the relevant person;</span></p>
<p class="orz-li-2"><span class="orz-li-body">specifies that minimum amount.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Subsection (7) provides that ‘single price’ means ‘the minimum quantifiable consideration for the supply concerned at the time of the representation concerned’, and sub-s&nbsp;(4) provides that the single price must be specified in at least as prominent a way as the most prominent component of the price.</p>
<p>So <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/tpa1974149/s53c.html">s&nbsp;53C</a> prevents corporations from advertising, say, movie tickets as $8 with the unavoidable $1 per ticket ‘booking fee’ buried in the fine print. It’s about time.</p>
<p>You can find a useful ACCC summary of the new section <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/816199">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cine-buzz-student-ad.jpg" alt="Greater Union CINE BUZZ student advertisement" title="Greater Union CINE BUZZ student advertisement" width="172" height="250" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-807 orz-img-border" /></p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Recently, Greater Union posted a similar promotion, for $7 movie tickets for students.</p>
<p>This time, the $7 includes the booking fee. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/06/25/the-clarity-in-pricing-act%e2%80%99s-new-s53c-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

