<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Orzeszek Blog &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog</link>
	<description>An inchoate upside-down perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Delete Flash Cookies Conveniently</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/08/12/how-to-delete-flash-cookies-conveniently/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/08/12/how-to-delete-flash-cookies-conveniently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of days ago, Wired reported on the questionable use of Flash cookies revealed by a UC Berkley study. Many users are unaware that Adobe’s popular Flash plugin stores its own cookies separately from normal browser cookies. Here’s how to get rid of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">A</span> couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/you-deleted-your-cookies-think-again/">Wired reported</a> on the questionable use of Flash cookies revealed by <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1446862">a UC Berkley study</a>. While non-novice Internet users are generally aware of cookies and their implications, fewer users are aware that Adobe’s popular Flash plugin stores its own cookies separately from normal browser cookies.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/betterprivacy-preferences.png"><img src="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/betterprivacy-preferences-500x412.png" alt="BetterPrivacy preferences" title="BetterPrivacy preferences" width="500" height="412" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-818 orz-img-no-border" /></a></p>
<p>If you’re using <a href="http://www.firefox.com/">Mozilla Firefox</a>, you can use the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623">BetterPrivacy add-on</a> to automatically delete all of your Flash cookies each time you close your browser. You can also configure BetterPrivacy to delete the cookies every few minutes. Or to allow you to manually delete them using its interface.</p>
<p>If you’re using <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/">Internet Explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>, or another browser, you can also use the Flash Settings Manager found <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager.html">here</a>. It’s a good idea to browse through this anyway, as it contains some handy privacy settings (including the ability to disable Flask cookies entirely).</p>
<p>And, for Mac OS X, there’s <a href="http://machacks.tv/2009/01/27/flushapp-flash-cookie-removal-tool-for-os-x/">Flush.app</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/08/12/how-to-delete-flash-cookies-conveniently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Firefox Morph into Chrome over Two Iterations?</title>
		<link>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/07/22/will-firefox-morph-into-chrome-over-two-iterations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/07/22/will-firefox-morph-into-chrome-over-two-iterations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 4.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, Firefox today looks like it belongs in the last decade. Recently, a number of blogs have picked up screenshots showing mock-ups of the interface for Firefox 3.7. But what I found more interesting was a proposed interface evolution showing Firefox morphing into Google Chrome over two iterations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">A</span> lot of people <a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2007/10/21/the-firefox-3-visual-refresh-system-integration.aspx">got excited</a> when <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/10/10/the-firefox-3-visual-refresh-system-integration/">Mozilla announced</a> in 2007 that Firefox 3 would include a visual refresh focussing on system integration. Finally, Firefox would look like it belonged in Windows Vista. Sadly, that <a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/05/18/with-firefox-3-themes-it-s-amateur-hour.aspx">wasn’t the case</a>, and Firefox today still looks like it belongs in the last decade.</p>
<p>Recently, a number of blogs have picked up <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/3.7_Windows_Theme_Mockups">these screenshots</a>, showing mock-ups of the interface for Firefox 3.7. But what I found more interesting was the proposed interface evolution shown <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Sprints/Windows_Theme_Revamp">here</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/firefox-35-to-37-evolution.png"><img src="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/firefox-35-to-37-evolution-500x531.png" alt="Firefox 3.5 to 3.7 interface evolution" title="Firefox 3.5 to 3.7 interface evolution" width="500" height="531" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-796 orz-img-no-border" /></a></p>
<p>After stopping off briefly at Firefox 3.7, the interface continues its evolution until it’s practically indistinguishable from Google Chrome.</p>
<p><span id="more-795"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/firefox-37-to-40-evolution.png"><img src="http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/firefox-37-to-40-evolution-500x531.png" alt="Firefox 3.7 to 4.0 interface evolution" title="Firefox 3.7 to 4.0 interface evolution" width="500" height="531" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-797 orz-img-no-border" /></a></p>
<p>I happen to love the Chrome interface, so, if accurate, this is nothing but good news. But it’ll be a long wait until Firefox 4.0. The question now is whether Google can add support for extensions to Chrome before Mozilla adds a modern interface to Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orzeszek.org/blog/2009/07/22/will-firefox-morph-into-chrome-over-two-iterations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

